The Fab Collective
Investor Access
Access Code
The Fab Collective, TFC Inc.

Financial Plan
2026 to 2030

Vietnam & Southeast Asia | Staff Housing + Hospitality + Education
Confidential | Prepared for Investor Review | May 2026
The Fab Collective Inc. Delaware C-Corp
Operations: Vietnam
CEO: Han Hoang
CDO: Freek Jansen
Stage: Pre-Revenue
Version: 1.0

The Opportunity in One Paragraph

Vietnam has 4.5 million workers in industrial zones. Half need housing. Current supply covers roughly 30% of actual demand, leaving a deficit of approximately 8.75 million square meters of floor space that no single integrated operator is equipped to fill at speed. The Fab Collective (TFC) is a DfMA-driven modular construction company positioned to close that gap faster, cheaper, and more consistently than traditional construction. The same panelized system scales to resort staff quarters and student dormitories. By 2030, TFC targets $12M+ in annual revenue across Vietnam and two additional Southeast Asian markets, with EBITDA margin approaching 30%.

$12M+
Target 2030 Revenue (base case)
30%+
Target Gross Margin (stabilized)
400+
Active Industrial Parks in Vietnam
50-70%
Faster Delivery vs. Traditional Build

Why Vietnam. Why Now.

Vietnam is one of Asia's fastest-industrializing economies. Over 400 active industrial parks are operating with average occupancy above 75-80% in northern and southern hubs. Foreign direct investment, led by electronics, semiconductors, and EV manufacturing, continues at pace, expanding demand for worker accommodation into second and third-tier provinces. The government's own target: one million new social housing units for industrial workers before 2030.

On the hospitality side, Vietnam closed 2025 with a record 21.5 million international arrivals, up roughly 22% year-on-year, and has set a 2026 target of 25 million. The hotel market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8-12% through 2031, anchored by coastal resort development in Da Nang, Nha Trang, Hoi An, and Phu Quoc. Every new resort requires staff housing. That demand is invisible in most market reports but very real on every project site.

The competition is fragmented. Traditional Vietnamese builders are slow. Foreign prefab importers are expensive. Local prefab suppliers lack design capability. No single operator combines BIM engineering, DfMA manufacturing logic, and end-to-end delivery control. TFC is built to be that operator.

Key data point: According to Savills Vietnam, there are approximately 4.5 million workers in industrial zones. Half require accommodation, demand totaling 12.5 million sqm of floor space. Current supply satisfies only 30% of actual need. That is not a niche problem. That is a structural failure TFC is designed to fix.

Three Markets. One System. Clear Priority Order.

TFC focuses on three accommodation segments, in this order of strategic priority. All three are served by the same core panelized system. The differentiation is finish spec, space-per-bed ratio, and client type.

Priority 01
Industrial Staff Housing
60%
of target revenue mix
Why first: Largest volume. Repeatable project type. Strong government support. Clients (industrial park developers, factory operators) have budget cycles and urgent need. Fastest path to case studies.
Tier: Economy ($270-330/sqm) to Standard ($360-440/sqm)
Avg project: 200-800 beds | $400K-$2.5M per contract
Priority 02
Resort Staff Accommodation
30%
of target revenue mix
Why second: Higher margin. Vietnam's hospitality pipeline is booming, with 430,000+ new rooms in the Asia-Pacific development pipeline. Every resort needs staff quarters. Premium finish spec means higher ASP.
Tier: Standard ($360-440/sqm) to Premium ($450-550/sqm)
Avg project: 40-200 beds | $200K-$1.2M per contract
Priority 03
Student Dormitories
10%
of target revenue mix
Why third: Real demand but longer institutional sales cycles. Government budget dependency. Lower price sensitivity due to procurement processes. Treated as pipeline diversification, not primary focus. First education delivery is modeled from 2028.
Tier: Economy ($270-330/sqm) with education multiplier
Avg project: 100-600 beds | $200K-$1.2M per contract

How TFC Gets Paid

Revenue is recognized on a per-project, per-square-meter basis. Clients pay for a complete delivered system: design, fabrication, logistics, and on-site assembly. TFC does not sell panels. TFC sells a finished, functional accommodation building, with a fixed price locked before production starts.

Tier Price Range (USD/sqm) Avg ASP Primary Segment Gross Margin Target
Economy $270 to $330 $300 Industrial dorms, basic staff housing 28-30%
Standard $360 to $440 $400 Mid-range staff quarters, education 30-33%
Premium $450 to $550 $500 Resort accommodation, exec housing 33-36%
Pricing note: All prices are per gross square meter. TFC applies a 1.35x gross factor to net usable space per bed (accounting for corridors, bathrooms, structure). A 12 sqm/bed Standard room = 16.2 gross sqm billed. Volume discounts apply on a log-curve: 0% at 5 beds scaling to ~12% at 500+ beds, passed to client and absorbed by production efficiency gains. Volume discounts apply primarily to industrial and education projects; hospitality projects under 200 beds are typically quoted at list price.
Milestone % of Contract Cumulative Received Timing Purpose
Deposit: Contract Signing 30% 30% Contract executed Design confirmation + material procurement kickoff
Production Start 30% 60% Factory production begins Covers manufacturing partner's material draw and production costs
Pre-Delivery 30% 90% Modules ready to ship, before leaving factory TFC has received 90% before a single panel leaves the factory gate
Final Completion 10% 100% Site handover + client sign-off Defect liability period begins; retention held by client
Factory Obligation Typical Factory Requirement TFC Cash Position at That Point Gap / Risk
Material procurement (steel, panels, MEP) 30-40% of production cost upfront 30% client deposit received Covered when deposit lands on schedule; 2-4 week timing gaps bridged by raise
Mid-production draw 30-40% at production midpoint 60% received (after Production Start payment) Covered when the second client draw aligns; bridge capital absorbs slippage
Final production + QC Balance before release from factory 90% received before delivery milestone Fully covered, factory paid in full before shipment
On-site assembly labor Weekly or milestone-based crew pay 90% already banked; 10% retention in hand No exposure, assembly funded from retained cash
The structure is intentional: TFC collects 90% of contract value before the product leaves the factory. This eliminates the main cash flow risk in construction: paying suppliers before the client pays you. The factory is paid in full on delivery; TFC's maximum cash exposure at any point is the gap between the production start payment and the factory's mid-production draw, which investor capital covers as a short-term bridge. The 10% retention held until final sign-off is standard in Vietnamese construction and protects the client. It is not a working capital risk for TFC at that stage. One honest caveat: large counterparties may negotiate lower deposits or higher retention on a first project with a new supplier. The raise is sized so TFC can absorb a less favorable pilot payment schedule without threatening delivery.

What One Bed Looks Like Financially

Each bed delivered is the base unit of analysis. Industrial projects are referenced at 300 beds, a typical mid-large factory dorm. Resort projects are referenced at 150 beds, reflecting a realistic staff complement for a mid-size coastal resort. Margins improve with volume due to production efficiency, overhead absorption, and procurement leverage. Note: the 2027 pilot projects in the P&L are deliberately smaller than these reference projects (100-200 beds). First deliveries prioritize proof and case studies over scale.

Industrial: Economy Tier
Space per bed (net)8 sqm
Gross sqm billed10.8 sqm
Revenue per bed$2,835
Est. COGS per bed$1,985
Gross Profit / bed$850 (30%)
Avg project (300 beds)$851K
GP on 300-bed project$255K
Industrial: Standard Tier
Space per bed (net)12 sqm
Gross sqm billed16.2 sqm
Revenue per bed$5,670
Est. COGS per bed$3,856
Gross Profit / bed$1,814 (32%)
Avg project (300 beds)$1.70M
GP on 300-bed project$544K
Resort: Premium Tier
Space per bed (net)12 sqm
Gross sqm billed16.2 sqm
Revenue per bed$8,100
Est. COGS per bed$5,265
Gross Profit / bed$2,835 (35%)
Avg project (150 beds)$1.22M
GP on 150-bed project$425K

Five-Year P&L | Base Case

Projections assume: mock-up validated August 2026; first contract signed Q1 2027; first revenue recognized Q2 2027. All figures in USD. COGS includes materials, manufacturing partner fees, logistics, and on-site assembly labor. OpEx covers salaries, travel, office, legal, and software. No external debt is assumed in this model. Student dormitory revenue starts in 2028, reflecting longer institutional sales cycles. Licensing revenue (2029+) is excluded from the base case. It is upside, not plan. Cumulative beds assume a blended average revenue of ~$3,500 per bed across tiers.

Line Item 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Revenue by Segment (USD)
Industrial Staff Housing - $400,000 $1,200,000 $3,000,000 $7,200,000
Resort Staff Accommodation - $200,000 $600,000 $1,500,000 $3,600,000
Student Dormitories - - $200,000 $500,000 $1,200,000
Total Revenue $0 $600,000 $2,000,000 $5,000,000 $12,000,000
Costs & Profitability
COGS (materials, mfg, logistics, assembly) - $420,000 $1,360,000 $3,350,000 $7,920,000
Gross Profit $0 $180,000 $640,000 $1,650,000 $4,080,000
Gross Margin % - 30% 31% 33% 34%
Operating Expenses (salaries, travel, admin) ($40,000) ($120,000) ($240,000) ($400,000) ($600,000)
EBITDA ($40,000) $60,000 $380,000 $1,250,000 $3,480,000
EBITDA Margin % - 10% 19% 25% 29%
Operating Metrics
Projects Delivered (full year) 0 2 5 10 18
Avg Revenue per Project (USD) - $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $667,000
Beds Delivered (cumulative) 0 ~170 ~750 ~2,100 ~5,500
Headcount (FTEs, end of year) 3 6 12 20 32
Conservative
1-2 projects/year delayed; slower ramp
2027 Revenue$300K
2028 Revenue$1.0M
2029 Revenue$2.5M
2030 Revenue$6M
2030 EBITDA~$1.2M
BreakevenQ2 2028
Base Case
Steady ramp; 2 projects in year 1
2027 Revenue$600K
2028 Revenue$2.0M
2029 Revenue$5.0M
2030 Revenue$12M
2030 EBITDA~$3.5M
BreakevenQ4 2027
Optimistic
3+ projects in year 1; SEA enters 2028
2027 Revenue$1.0M
2028 Revenue$3.5M
2029 Revenue$9.0M
2030 Revenue$20M
2030 EBITDA~$5.8M
BreakevenQ3 2027

Where the Money Goes

TFC's cost model is predominantly variable. COGS scales directly with project output. Fixed overhead is deliberately lean. The early-stage strategy is to use manufacturing partners (contract manufacturers in Vietnam) rather than own the factory. This eliminates capex, reduces breakeven, and keeps the model asset-light until volume justifies a proprietary facility.

Cost Category % of Revenue (2027) % of Revenue (2029) Nature Notes
Materials (panels, steel, MEP, fittings) 42-45% 38-40% Variable Largest cost driver; improves with procurement scale
Manufacturing partner fees 10-12% 8-10% Variable Renegotiates down at volume; eventually in-house option
Logistics & shipping 8-10% 7-9% Variable Domestic transport; regional adds cost in SEA phase
On-site assembly labor 6-8% 5-7% Variable Vietnam labor cost advantage; small skilled crew per project
Design & engineering (project-level) 3-4% 2-3% Semi-variable Reduces as BIM templates are standardized
Total COGS 70% 67% Gross margin 30-33%
Operating Expenses (fixed/semi-fixed):
Staff salaries (CEO, design, ops, sales) 13-14% 4-5% Fixed Scales with headcount; major leverage as revenue grows
Travel & Vietnam operations 3-4% 1-2% Semi-fixed Reduces as team is locally based post-2027
Legal, compliance, admin 2-3% 1% Fixed US + Vietnam entities; one-time legal work front-loaded
Marketing, client development 1-2% 1-2% Semi-variable Grows modestly with geographic expansion
Key insight on margin expansion: Materials are the primary lever. At $600K revenue (2027), TFC has limited procurement power. At $5M revenue (2029), volume purchasing across multiple projects enables 4-6% material cost reduction, flowing directly to gross margin. This is why margin expands from 30% in 2027 to 34% by 2030. OpEx grows from $400K to $600K between 2029 and 2030, a 50% increase that reflects 12 additional headcount (20 to 32 FTEs), full founder market salaries, and operations across three countries, not a doubling of fixed overhead.

What We Need and Where It Goes

TFC is an asset-light model. Capital is not required to build a factory. It is required to fund three things: pre-revenue operations, working capital on initial projects (materials must be procured before client milestone payments arrive), and team formation. The business becomes self-funding from late 2027 on the base case.

Pre-Revenue Phase (2026)
Mock-up build (materials, components)$10K to $15K
Design & engineering (Freek, equity)Equity
Vietnam travel & site operations$4K to $6K
Legal & incorporation (Delaware + Vietnam rep)$3K to $5K
Manufacturing partner development$3K to $5K
Web, brand, admin, tools$2K to $3K
Contingency (10%)$2K to $3K
Total 2026 Burn$24K to $37K
Project Working Capital (2027)
Working capital bridge (materials before payment)$80K to $120K
Team salaries (2 hires: ops + BD)$40K to $60K
Vietnam representative office setup$10K to $20K
Client development + site visits$8K to $12K
Tech, BIM software, tooling$5K to $10K
Total 2027 Capital Need$143K to $222K
Scale Bridge (Late 2027 to 2028)
Working capital, projects #2-#4 (parallel delivery)$85K to $150K
Hire #3: sales / project delivery lead$25K to $40K
Certifications, QC audits, partner expansion$12K to $25K
Reserve$13K to $25K
Total Scale Bridge$135K to $240K
Total external capital target: $300K to $500K, fully allocated across the three phases above: 2026 burn ($24K-$37K), first-project working capital and team ($143K-$222K), and the scale bridge for projects #2-#4 ($135K-$240K). The payment structure (30% deposit at signing, 90% collected before delivery) ensures TFC is never funding the full project from its own balance sheet. Self-funding begins Q4 2027 on the base case. No external debt assumed. Round structured as a convertible note or SAFE.

The Roadmap to Revenue

Q3 2026
Mock-up Complete. System Validated. Physical mock-up built and signed off. This is the critical proof point: for partners, investors, and first clients. Vietnam representative office established. Manufacturing partner agreements in final negotiation.
Q4 2026
Client Outreach Begins. First proposals sent to industrial park developers and resort operators. Target: 3-5 active proposals in market by end of Q4. Investor round closes (if external capital is pursued).
Q1 2027
First Contract Signed. Target: industrial staff housing pilot, 100-200 beds. Economy or Standard tier. Deposit received. Production initiated with manufacturing partner. BIM fabrication files issued.
Q2 2027
First Revenue Recognized. First Project Delivered. Project handover. Case study documented. Begin second project. Sales pipeline accelerates with proof of delivery. Resort segment conversations intensify.
2027-2028
Scale to 4-6 Concurrent Projects. Standardized product lines launched. Pricing and costing framework locked. Team grows to 10-12. Gross margin improves through material procurement leverage. First resort project delivered.
2028-2029
Regional Expansion Begins. First project outside Vietnam (Indonesia or Cambodia, see Section 10). Licensable system framework under development. $5M+ annual revenue target. EBITDA positive and growing.
2029-2030
Platform Play. TFC is operating across 2-3 SEA markets. Licensing model piloted with regional developer partners. Production capacity at 150 units/month. $12M revenue target. EBITDA approaching 30%.

Vietnam First. Then the Region.

TFC is a Vietnam-first business. All capital and management focus is concentrated there through 2028. Southeast Asia expansion is not speculative. It is a natural follow-on once the system is proven, documented, and repeatable. The same structural tailwinds driving demand in Vietnam (industrial investment, tourism growth, housing deficit) exist across the region.

Vietnam
Phase 1 (2026-2028)
Core market. 400+ industrial parks. Booming resort pipeline. Government housing push. Full operational focus.
Indonesia
Phase 2 (2028-2029)
275M population. Rapid industrial park growth in Java and Sulawesi. Massive housing deficit. SEA's largest untapped modular market.
Cambodia
Phase 2 (2028-2029)
Fastest-growing SEZ pipeline after Vietnam. Lower complexity to enter. Similar client profiles. Proximity to TFC Vietnam ops.
Philippines
Phase 3 (2029-2030)
$25B infrastructure push. Rapid resort development in Palawan and Cebu. English-language business environment reduces friction.
Licensing as the growth engine: From 2029 onward, TFC does not need to be the builder in every market. The long-term model is to license the system (design standards, fabrication documentation, procurement specifications, assembly protocols) to regional developers and construction operators. Each licensing agreement generates recurring technical service fees without capital deployment. This is how TFC becomes a platform, not just a contractor.

What Could Go Wrong and How We Handle It

Mock-up delays or system failure
High impact
All client conversations and investor closes are gated behind mock-up sign-off. If mock-up reveals system issues, we fix before going to market, not after. Contingency budget held for redesign.
Long sales cycles (industrial clients)
High impact
Industrial park developers move on procurement cycles. Outreach starts Q4 2026 to build pipeline for Q1-Q2 2027 signing. Parallel resort conversations kept active to diversify deal flow.
Manufacturing partner quality / reliability
Medium impact
TFC qualifies 2-3 manufacturing partners before signing any client contract. QC protocols embedded in fabrication agreements. BIM-to-fabrication output reduces dependency on factory interpretation.
Working capital pressure on first projects
Medium impact
Contract payment structure (30% deposit at signing, 90% collected before delivery) means TFC is never fully exposed on any single project. Investor capital bridges the gap between the production start payment and the factory's material draw. No more than 2 projects taken on simultaneously until the cash cycle is proven.
Vietnam regulatory / permitting risk
Medium impact
TFC's system is modular, so clients handle site permits (as with all construction). TFC maintains local legal counsel and stays current on prefab/modular classification under Vietnamese construction law.
FX exposure (USD/VND)
Lower impact
TFC invoices in USD for larger clients; VND for local transactions. Material costs are primarily VND-denominated. Natural hedge exists as revenue and costs are partially in same currency.

Why TFC Wins This Market

Three things need to be true for TFC to win:

The demand is real
8.75M sqm housing deficit for Vietnam industrial workers alone. Supply covers 30% of need. This is a structural gap, not a cyclical one.
The product works faster
50-70% faster delivery than traditional construction. Factory-controlled quality. Fixed price before production. These are not marketing claims. They are the definition of modular construction done properly.
The team has the edge
BIM + DfMA expertise from THE BIM FACTORY. Real Vietnam construction experience. Integrated execution, not a design-only or supply-only operation. No competitor in Vietnam currently combines all three.
The model scales
Asset-light manufacturing (partner model). Same system repeats across segments and geographies. Licensing as the long-term revenue multiplier. EBITDA expands with volume, with no new capex required to grow.
Return framework (illustrative, not a guarantee): TFC is raising $300K-$500K via convertible note or SAFE, entering before the three milestones that re-rate the company: mock-up validation (Q3 2026), first signed contract (Q1 2027), and first delivered project (Q2 2027). On the base case, TFC reaches ~$3.5M EBITDA by 2030. Construction-platform and modular businesses in the region typically transact at mid-single-digit EBITDA multiples, implying a base-case enterprise value in the $15M-$25M range by 2030, before any licensing upside, which is excluded from the model. Seed capital at pre-mock-up pricing carries the highest risk in the company's life and is priced accordingly. Exit paths: Series A secondary, strategic acquisition by a regional developer or construction group, or dividend capacity from 2028 onward.
Download PDF